In this guide
You can read this page without contacting anyone. If you decide to reach out, you can do it without giving your name. Nothing happens until you say so. If this happened to you or your child at a Kern High School District campus, the record below is public, and the sections after it explain what the law allows. The law in full is on our California school sexual abuse lawyer page.
The Bakersfield High lawsuit
Univision's Bakersfield station reported a lawsuit against the Kern High School District over an incident at Bakersfield High School. The complaint alleges that in 2019 a freshman sexually abused a female classmate in the middle of class while a teacher stood in front of the students, 15 feet away. According to the complaint, the same student had already been accused of sexually abusing three other female students at age 14. The complaint alleges that neither administrators nor teachers supervised the student or took the measures needed to control his behavior. The report is undated and records no response from the district. We have found no reported outcome. An allegation in a complaint is not a finding, and the district has not been found liable.
Abuse by another student
A district's duty to supervise is not limited to abuse by employees. School personnel owe students a duty to use reasonable measures to protect them from foreseeable harm, and that harm can come from another student. When the abuser is a classmate, the questions are practical. What did the school know about that student before the incident? What supervision was in place in the room? What did staff do when it happened, and did anyone report it? A district that had notice of earlier accusations and kept the student in an ordinary classroom with no added supervision has a supervision problem. That is the claim the Bakersfield complaint describes. The student's own conduct is a separate matter for the criminal system, and a civil claim does not depend on it.
Status of the cases
The suit was filed and, as of the Univision report, unresolved. The report gives no filing date, so we describe it as undated rather than guess. If the case resolves, we will add the outcome, the date and the source. Univision covered it in Spanish, and you can call us in Spanish. Other districts in the region are on our Central Valley and Sacramento page.
Filing deadlines
California has two tracks. For abuse on or after January 1, 2024, there is no time limit; that is AB 452, now Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1(p). For abuse before that date, including 2019, AB 218 controls: a survivor may file until age 40, or within five years of discovering that an adult injury was caused by the abuse, whichever is later. Survivors 40 and older also file certificates of merit from an attorney and a licensed mental health practitioner. No government claim is required for childhood sexual assault under Government Code section 905(m). SB 577 passed the Legislature at the end of August 2026 and awaited the Governor as of September 23, 2026. It may change the rules for older claims. Our statute of limitations page tracks it.
District responsibility
A public district answers for its employees under Government Code section 815.2. In C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District (2012), the California Supreme Court held that a district can be liable when its administrators negligently hired, kept or supervised an abusive employee. In Doe v. Lawndale Elementary School District (2021), the Court of Appeal held that this duty does not depend on proof that the district knew of the employee's prior misconduct. Whether administrators responded reasonably to warning signs is a question for the jury. Section 340.1 allows up to treble damages for a cover-up, but in Los Angeles Unified School District v. Superior Court (2023) the Supreme Court held that Government Code section 818 bars that enhancement against public entities. We do not promise it.
A confidential first step
Call, text, or use the confidential form on this page. The form has no narrative box; it asks how to reach you and whether it is safe to call. A Jane Doe or John Doe filing is common in these cases, and we will ask whether you want one. You do not have to face the abuser to bring a claim. We handle cases statewide by phone, video and travel. No fee unless we recover. If there is no recovery, you owe no fee and no case costs.
Records to gather
You do not need any documents to call. Our before you call checklist for adult survivors lists what helps: the school and the years, the adult's role, who was in the room, yearbooks, photos, messages, and friends who knew. Parents can use our after your child tells you checklist. Write down what your child said in their words, with the date. Preserve messages and devices, and ask the school for its written policy and its Title IX coordinator's name. Do not contact the other student's family or the district, and do not post details online.
Sources cited
- Univision Bakersfield, lawsuit alleging sexual abuse of a minor at a Bakersfield school
- Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1
- CSBA legal update on AB 452
- FCMAT report, January 31, 2025
- Government Code section 905
- Government Code section 815.2
- C.A. v. William S. Hart (2012), summarized
- Doe v. Lawndale (2021)
- Los Angeles Unified v. Superior Court (2023)
- CalMatters on SB 577, August 2026
- SB 577 bill status