In this guide
The spouse, parent, or child of someone who died on a jobsite, in a warehouse, on a delivery route, or anywhere on the clock faces the death benefit, exclusivity (the rule that workers' compensation is usually the only claim against the employer) and its exceptions, the parallel civil claim, and the limits on suing a hirer, the company that hired the contractor. Our Los Angeles construction accident page covers non-fatal jobsite injuries under the same framework.
What the death benefit pays
Labor Code section 4701 makes an employer liable, when an injury causes death, for reasonable burial expenses and a death benefit for the dependents. Section 4702 sets the amounts, flat numbers rather than a calculation of what the family lost.
| Dependents | Benefit | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Three or more total dependents | $320,000 | Labor Code 4702(a)(5) |
| Two total dependents | $290,000 | Labor Code 4702(a)(1) |
| One total dependent, no partial dependents | $250,000 | Labor Code 4702(a)(3) |
| One total plus partial dependents | $250,000 plus support, capped at $290,000 | Labor Code 4702(a)(2) |
| Partial dependents only | Eight times annual support, up to $250,000 | Labor Code 4702(a)(4)(B) |
| No dependents at all | $250,000 to the estate | Labor Code 4702(a)(6)(B) |
| Burial expenses, injuries on or after January 1, 2013 | Up to $10,000 | Labor Code 4701(a) |
Section 4702(b) requires payment in installments at the rate temporary total disability, the weekly wage replacement benefit, would have been paid, with a floor of $224 a week. Section 4702(c) confirms disability indemnity, meaning disability payments, is not deducted from the death benefit and is paid in addition to it.
The claim has its own clock. Section 5406 gives one year, measured from the death where it occurred within a year of the injury, or from the last benefit furnished where it did not. It bars proceedings more than one year after the death or more than 240 weeks from the date of injury.
Why the employer usually cannot be sued
Section 3602(a) states the bargain. Where the conditions of compensation in section 3600 concur, the right to recover compensation is the sole and exclusive remedy of the employee or the dependents against the employer, except as provided in that section and in sections 3706 and 4558. It also closes a familiar workaround, providing that an employer that also dealt with the worker in a second role, a dual capacity, does not thereby become suable in tort, meaning in an ordinary civil suit.
Subdivision (b) lists the three exceptions, each narrow on purpose. The first is a death proximately caused by a willful physical assault by the employer. The second is an injury aggravated by the employer's fraudulent concealment of the injury and its connection with the employment, where liability is limited to the damages caused by the aggravation and the employer bears the burden of apportionment, meaning it must prove how much of the harm the concealment caused. The third is a death proximately caused by a defective product the employer made and sold, leased, or transferred for value to an independent third person, who then provided it for the employee's use.
The fourth route is not in section 3602. Section 3706 provides that if an employer fails to secure the payment of compensation, an injured employee or the dependents may sue that employer as if the workers' compensation division did not apply. An uninsured employer faces the full civil claim, which is why checking coverage is the first thing we do in a work death file.
The claim against everyone but the employer
Section 3852 preserves it plainly: a claim for compensation does not affect the right of action for all damages proximately resulting from the injury or death against any person other than the employer. On a construction site that list is long, and it is where the value of a fatal case usually sits.
- The general contractor, and any subcontractor whose work created the hazard.
- The property owner, and any developer separate from the owner.
- The manufacturer, lessor, or maintainer of the equipment involved.
- An engineer or architect whose design or inspection touched the failure.
- A driver or vehicle owner, where the death happened on the road.
The employer or its workers' compensation insurer will assert a lien, a claim to be repaid, for benefits paid against any recovery from those defendants. Section 3852 leaves that contest to the judge: the respective rights against the third person of the heirs claiming under Code of Civil Procedure section 377.60, and of an employer claiming reimbursement, are determined by the court. Allocating a settlement between them is part of the negotiation. How a wrongful death award is divided explains the rest.
When the general contractor can be sued
Naming the general contractor or the site owner is not the same as winning. This is the Privette limit on suing the hirer. CACI No. 1009B, in the Judicial Council's 2025 civil jury instructions, requires a contractor's employee to prove four things. The defendant retained some control over the manner of performance of the contracted work, it actually exercised that control, the plaintiff was harmed, and the negligent exercise of that control affirmatively contributed to the harm.
The Directions for Use, the notes that accompany the instruction, explain why both control elements exist: hirers who fully and effectively delegate work owe no tort duty, meaning no duty of care in a civil suit, to that contractor's workers, citing Sandoval v. Qualcomm Inc. (2021) 12 Cal.5th 256, 273. The affirmative contribution requirement comes from Hooker v. Department of Transportation (2002) 27 Cal.4th 198, 202, and the instruction notes it can be satisfied by a failure to act.
| What the hirer did | Supports a claim | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Directed that the work be done a particular way | Yes | Tverberg (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1439, 1446 |
| Promised a safety measure, then failed to provide it | Yes | Hooker, 27 Cal.4th 198, 212, fn. 3 |
| Passively permitted an unsafe condition | No | Tverberg, at 1446 |
| Failed to correct an unsafe condition, alone | No | Khosh (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 712, 718 |
| Fully and effectively delegated the work | No duty at all | Sandoval, 12 Cal.5th 256, 273 |
| Negligently hired the contractor | No | Sandoval, at 278 |
Those authorities point the investigation at what the hirer told the crew to do and what it promised. Sandoval, at 277, frames it as inducement rather than omission: where the contractor's conduct is the immediate cause, affirmative contribution requires that the hirer induced, and not merely failed to prevent, that conduct. Safety meeting minutes, daily logs, the subcontract, and the site rules are where that evidence lives.
Getting the Cal/OSHA file early
California employers must immediately report any work-related death or serious injury to Cal/OSHA by telephone, and Title 8, section 342 sets out what the call includes. That report starts an investigation producing witness statements, photographs, and equipment findings a family cannot get any other way, whether or not anyone has hired a lawyer.
- 765California construction deaths from 2015 to 2024Cal/OSHA CFOI, April 2026
- 43of the 94 fall, slip, and trip deaths in 2024 were construction workersCal/OSHA CFOI, April 2026
- 4,300total California workplace deaths from 2015 to 2024Cal/OSHA CFOI, April 2026
The source is the Division of Occupational Safety and Health's April 2026 report, Fatal Occupational Injuries in California, 2015 to 2024. It puts the construction fatality rate at an average of 6.3 per 100,000 workers against 2.5 statewide, and records that 81 of the 94 fall deaths in 2024 were falls to a lower level.
When the usual rule changes
- A staffing agency or labor contractor. Section 3602(d) lets one employer secure compensation for workers supplied by another under a valid agreement, and both are then treated as having secured payment. That can put exclusivity in front of a company the family assumed was a third party.
- A public agency owned the site. The six month written claim deadline in Government Code section 911.2 applies to the civil claim against that entity, and runs while the compensation case is still opening.
- Peace officers and firefighters. Section 3852(b), added by Senate Bill 487 effective January 1, 2026, caps the employer's recovery at one third of the third party's liability limits for officers and firefighters employed by a city, county, city and county, or fire protection district. The cap applies where the employee's damages exceed the net recovery and the limits cannot compensate both.
- No dependents. The death benefit still pays $250,000 to the estate under section 4702(a)(6)(B), while the wrongful death claim may have no qualifying heir at all.
- The estate's separate claim. Where the worker survived the injury for a period, the estate has a survival action for the medical costs and lost earnings from it. What that no longer includes is on our page about survival actions.
What to do with both claims open
File the compensation claim. It pays burial costs and installments while everything else takes its time, and it does not require proving fault. Then treat the civil investigation as a separate job with a shorter deadline: equipment gets repaired or returned, the site changes within days, and the crew disperses to other jobs. Both tracks run at once, and the second usually decides what the family is left with.
If you are not sure whether anyone besides the employer was involved, the Cal/OSHA file and the subcontract answer that. The main wrongful death page covers the deadlines and who in the family may bring the civil claim.
No fee unless we recover.
