Available now(424) 235-7879

Left turn and right of way motorcycle accidentsThe turning driver had to yield.

Under Vehicle Code section 21801, a driver turning left must yield to every vehicle approaching from the opposite direction that is close enough to constitute a hazard. When the driver tells the officer he never saw the motorcycle, he has described the failure the statute forbids. Our attorneys build these cases on the driver's first statement, the point of impact and the marks left on the road.

In this guide

These cases involve a car turning left across a rider's path, pulling out of a driveway or a parking lot, or crossing at an intersection in Los Angeles County. For coverage, deadlines and injuries, start at our Los Angeles motorcycle accident lawyer page.

What the turning driver owed you

Section 21801(a) says the driver of a vehicle intending to turn left or to complete a U-turn upon a highway shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles approaching from the opposite direction which are close enough to constitute a hazard. A Los Angeles jury hears that rule as CACI No. 704, the standard jury instruction on the point. CACI No. 701 tells the jury what yielding the right-of-way means: the turning driver must let the approaching vehicle go first, and having the right-of-way never relieves anyone of the duty to use reasonable care.

Subdivision (b) is the part the defense will rely on. Once a driver has yielded as subdivision (a) requires and has given the signal the code requires, that driver may complete the turn, and approaching drivers must then yield to the turning vehicle. The case therefore turns on timing. If the car was already committed and signaling when you were still a block back, the statute favors the driver. If the car turned into a motorcycle that was already in the intersection, it does not.

Why the driver's statement helps your claim

It is the most common statement at a motorcycle scene, and it is often the reason these cases resolve. CACI No. 700 tells the jury that a driver must use reasonable care in driving, must keep a lookout for pedestrians, obstacles and other vehicles, and must control the speed and movement of the vehicle. A driver who says he looked and saw nothing has either not looked or not seen what was in front of him. Both are failures of the same duty.

Where a violation of a statute like section 21801 is established, the jury can be instructed under CACI No. 418 to presume the driver was negligent, which shifts the work to the defense. The driver's statement is valuable because it arrives before anyone has a lawyer. Officers write it down at the scene. The version that appears in a recorded interview four weeks later is usually longer, more careful, and inconsistent with the first one.

What the point of impact proves

A left-turning car sweeps through an arc, and the further along that arc it travels, the further back along its body a motorcycle will strike it. That geometry is fixed and does not depend on anyone's memory, which is why we photograph both vehicles before either is towed. A reconstruction engineer works backward from crush depth, contact height and the rest positions to a range of approach speeds.

Where the motorcycle struck the car, and what it means
Contact point on the carHow far into the turnWhat the defense will argue
Front bumper or right front cornerThe turn had barely startedThe rider was speeding and closed the distance
Right front doorThe car was mid-arc, across your laneThe car was committed and you had time to brake
Right rear door or rear quarterThe turn was nearly completeThe car had yielded and 21801(b) had transferred the duty
Left side of the carThe car came from your side, not across itA different section applies and this is not a 21801 case
No contact at allYou went down avoiding the turnWithout an impact there is no claim, which witnesses and the marks answer

What the motorcycle's road marks prove

Riders and cars leave different evidence, and officers trained on cars sometimes miss half of it. These marks fade in days and are paved over in weeks, so we visit the scene early in the case.

  • The gouge. A deep score where metal met pavement marks the point of impact more reliably than any witness. We measure it against the lane lines and the limit line.
  • Scuff and yaw marks. A tire sliding sideways leaves striations across the mark rather than along it. That difference distinguishes a lockup from a swerve.
  • The absence of skid on an ABS bike. Anti-lock braking leaves little or nothing. An adjuster who argues that the absence of skid marks means you never braked is wrong about the technology.
  • Fluid trails and debris fields. Coolant, oil and glass spread from the impact point in a direction that records the momentum of both vehicles.
  • Rest positions. Where the bike, the rider and the car stopped bounds the energy in the collision and constrains the speed range.
  • Headlight and turn signal filaments. A filament that was lit at impact deforms differently from a cold one. It answers both whether your headlight was on and whether the driver signaled.

How often turning drivers hit riders

UC Berkeley's Safe Transportation Research and Education Center reports that in California in 2023, improper turning was the primary collision factor in 19.8 percent of fatal and serious injury motorcycle crashes. An automobile right of way violation accounted for another 19.3 percent, 39.1 percent between them. Broadside was the most common crash type at 31.1 percent (SafeTREC 2025 traffic safety facts, motorcycle safety). Those are statewide California figures. A broadside is what a left turn across a rider's path produces, which is why this pattern is both the most common serious one and the one where liability is clearest.

When the usual rule does not apply

  • You were speeding. The defense will argue you were not close enough to constitute a hazard when the turn began. Speed reduces your recovery under comparative fault, the rule that cuts an award by your share of the blame. It does not erase a turn made across an occupied lane.
  • The car had a green arrow. A protected left changes the analysis, because the opposing traffic had a red. We pull the signal phasing before assuming anything about who had what.
  • The driver signaled and waited. Section 21801(b) then puts the yield on you. This is the difficult case, and it turns on how long the car sat in the intersection before moving.
  • Another driver waved the car through. A wave from a stopped motorist is not a traffic control device, and it does not transfer the statutory duty. It can add a second defendant.
  • You were lane splitting when the car turned. The defense will argue about the turn and about your lane position at the same time. Neither is a statutory violation on your part, and our lane splitting accidents page covers the lane position argument.
  • The car came out of a driveway or a lot. Different code sections apply, but the proof is identical: sight lines photographed from the driver's seat, and the contact point on the car.

What to do while the evidence lasts

Have the intersection photographed from the driver's eye position, not from standing height, and before the season changes what the trees and the parked cars block. Ask for the signal phasing in writing from whoever operates the intersection. Send a preservation letter, a written demand that the car be kept as it is, so its event data recorder can be downloaded before it is repaired or sold.

Clear liability does not by itself set the value of the claim. What a turning-driver case is worth depends on the coverage behind the driver and on how the injuries are documented, which our motorcycle accident settlements page sets out instruction by instruction. The same yield rules decide fault when the person crossing the intersection is on foot, which our Los Angeles pedestrian accident lawyer page covers.

Tell our attorneys what happened at the intersection.

No fee unless we recover.

Get a free case review

Common questions

Who is at fault when a car turns left in front of a motorcycle?
Usually the turning driver. Vehicle Code section 21801(a) requires a driver turning left or completing a U-turn to yield to all vehicles approaching from the opposite direction that are close enough to constitute a hazard, and the jury is read CACI No. 704. Fault shifts only if the driver had already yielded and signaled before turning, which subdivision (b) addresses, or if the rider's speed made the approach impossible to judge.
The driver told police he did not see me. Does that help my case?
It usually helps a great deal. CACI No. 700 requires a driver to use reasonable care, keep a lookout for other vehicles, and control the speed and movement of the car. Saying he never saw a motorcycle in front of him describes the breach of that duty. We make sure the statement is in the collision report, because the version given weeks later is almost always more careful.
What does close enough to constitute a hazard mean?
It has no fixed distance. It asks whether an approaching vehicle was near enough that a reasonable driver should have waited, judged on the actual intersection, speeds and sight lines. Our attorneys answer it with measurements: the length of the turn arc, the signal phase, video timestamps, and a reconstruction of the motorcycle's approach speed from the damage and rest positions.
There were no skid marks. Does that mean I was not braking?
No. Most modern motorcycles have anti-lock brakes, which are designed to prevent the wheel lockup that leaves a skid mark. Riders also brake hard without locking. We look instead for a gouge at the impact point, scuff and yaw marks, a debris field, and where the bike and rider came to rest.
Does it matter where the motorcycle hit the car?
It is often the single most useful fact in the file. A car turning left travels an arc, so a strike near the front bumper means the turn had barely begun and a strike at the rear door means it was nearly finished. That geometry does not depend on anyone's memory. We photograph both vehicles before either is towed, because a repaired car cannot be measured.
What if the car pulled out of a driveway or a parking lot instead?
The proof is the same even though the code section differs. The driver looked for a windshield at car height, saw a gap, and moved into it. Photographs taken from the driver's seat show what the driver could see, and the contact point on the car shows how far out it had travelled. A rider hit this way has the same claim.
Another driver waved the turning car through. Does that change fault?
It does not remove the turning driver's duty. A wave from a stopped motorist is not a traffic control device, and section 21801 still puts the yield on the driver making the turn. It can add a defendant, because a driver who signals another into a lane they cannot see may share responsibility. We identify that driver early, because they usually leave the scene.
Have a question about your case?

Speak with an attorney. The review is free and you will get a direct answer.

(424) 235-7879

Start here

Tell us what happened. We'll tell you where you stand.

Every case review is free, confidential, and handled by a licensed attorney. Someone is available 24 hours a day, and we usually respond right away. No commitment required.

  • No fee unless we recover
  • Confidential, no obligation
  • Se habla español
Or call the firm directly(424) 235-7879

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We respond to every inquiry.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is formed only by a signed written fee agreement.

Call nowText us